Skip to main content

Nutrition in Abrupt Sunlight Reduction Scenarios: analysis and prevention of malnutrition in low-income regions

  • Z. Asal, J. B. García Martínez, M. Hinge, D. Denkenberger
Pre-print available online from:
12 October 2025

Summary

Severe global shocks (e.g., abrupt sunlight reduction scenarios) could disrupt crops. We identify low-cost foods and resilient food interventions such as seaweeds and microbial food to meet essential nutrients, especially for low-income countries. We model diets, highlight shortfalls (e.g., calcium, iodine, B12), and propose fortification and sourcing strategies to close gaps while keeping costs affordable and logistics feasible. We discuss policy interventions to address the issue.

 
Abrupt Sunlight Reduction Scenario (ASRS), Nuclear winter, Economic analysis, Nutrition

Abstract

Purpose: An abrupt sunlight reduction scenario (ASRS) can be triggered by a nuclear war, a large volcanic eruption, or an asteroid strike, resulting in global agricultural collapse. A wide portfolio of resilient food interventions has been developed to address these issues, but even if they succeed in providing sufficient food energy for the global population, economic inequality could still result in fatal malnutrition in low-income countries (LICs).
Methods: Low-cost diets (<$1/person/day) based on ASRS-resilient foods were optimized to reduce malnutrition with sufficient energy intake. The generated dietary combinations were compared to dietary guidelines.
Results: The estimated diets were insufficient to achieve balanced diets, resulting in widespread malnutrition. We find that not only continued international trade but also significant food aid is needed to prevent widespread LIC starvation in a severe ASRS. Severe nutritional deficiencies are present: at the onset (Period 1), vitamins A, E, D, C, B3, B5, calcium, zinc, iodine, and selenium; and in the longer term (Period 2), vitamins E, D, K, B5, B6, B12, zinc, and selenium. Seaweed and single-cell proteins are resilient foods that contain notable quantities of many of these; however, large intakes of these are likely to be unfeasible without extensive processing.
Conclusion: To reduce the risk of malnutrition and mass starvation in a severe ASRS, LICs would need to develop the capability to ramp up resilient food production internally, perhaps through international cooperation, and/or establish international trade agreements for food and supplements in case of a disaster. Otherwise, if a global food shock occurs, they risk being left dependent on the mercy of catastrophe-stricken, wealthier nations.

Explore more

Psychological Demand of Catastrophic Risk: A Framework for Mental and Behavioural Resilience Under Systemic Disruption

Crop yields under simulated nuclear winter: a growth chamber experiment

Calculating equilibrium cereal prices during a multi-year productivity shock

Subscribe to the ALLFED newsletter