Skip to main content

Calculating equilibrium cereal prices during a multi-year productivity shock

  • M. Hinge, Ł. G. Gajewski, R. Frank, S. Blouin, F. U. Jehn, D. Denkenberger
Pre-print available online from:
26 February 2026

Summary

This paper models how global cereal markets would respond to a protracted agricultural productivity shock to better understand how economic incentives and policy responses could reduce the impact on humans. While market mechanisms offer some mitigation, the model finds that cereal prices could still rise more than tenfold, with accurate forecasting of the shock's severity emerging as a critical factor in minimizing harm to low-income populations worldwide.

Abrupt Sunlight Reduction Scenario (ASRS), Nuclear winter, Economic analysis, Food & supply chains

Abstract

A protracted disruption to global crop yields, for example following a large volcanic eruption, nuclear winter or a climate tipping point relevant to agriculture being crossed, has the potential to seriously shock the food system; however, the severity of its impact depends upon how the food system responds. We attempt to help answer this question by creating a partial equilibrium of production, consumption and storage of the cereal market under a protracted disruption to agricultural productivity. We find that economic incentives could reduce the impact of a future shock on consumption versus past estimates, and should be considered when assessing the impact of such a shock. However, we also estimate that the global price rises under all our scenarios would be high and, under several scenarios, could exceed a factor of 10 over the present day, seriously threatening food access for low-income consumers worldwide. Our scenarios are sensitive to highly uncertain factors, including how fast the crop area can expand, the volatility of yields, as well as initial stocks. Finally, we find that incorrectly calibrated expectations of the yield shock raise its severity significantly, with both an under and over-assessment of its magnitude expected to reduce welfare, although this effect is worse for excessive optimism. We hope this framework can offer tools to assess positive and negative policy responses to future food productivity shocks, the potential for adaptation to save lives, and can be built upon over time due to its flexibility and modularity.

Explore more

Psychological Demand of Catastrophic Risk: A Framework for Mental and Behavioural Resilience Under Systemic Disruption

Crop yields under simulated nuclear winter: a growth chamber experiment

Global potential of integrated biorefineries for leaf protein and sugar: Producing sustainable food and preventing starvation in catastrophes

Subscribe to the ALLFED newsletter