Skip to main content

Strategic crop relocation could substantially mitigate nuclear winter yield losses

  • S. Blouin, M. Rivers, M. Hinge, M. Antonietta, I. Jimenez, F. U. Jehn, D. C. Denkenberger
Pre-print available online from:
11 September 2025

Summary

Strategically switching which crops are grown where could approximately double global food production during the worst years of a severe nuclear winter, potentially saving billions of lives.

Abrupt Sunlight Reduction Scenario (ASRS), Nuclear winter, Agricultural Resilience, Crop relocation

Abstract

Nuclear war could inject millions of tonnes of soot into the stratosphere, cooling the Earth and devastating crop yields. We assess crop relocation—switching which crops are grown where—as an adaptation strategy. Using the Mink crop model, we simulate six major crops under three nuclear winter scenarios (16, 47, and 150 Tg of soot). Without adaptation, global caloric production falls 23%, 53%, and 85% respectively during the worst year of each scenario. We find that mild cooling scenarios favor expanding high-calorie warm-season crops like rice and maize, while severe scenarios require extensive conversion to cold-tolerant crops like rapeseed. In the extreme 150 Tg scenario, crop relocation could double food production compared to current planting patterns. While insufficient to prevent widespread famine in severe scenarios, crop relocation has the potential to save billions of lives.

Explore more

Psychological Demand of Catastrophic Risk: A Framework for Mental and Behavioural Resilience Under Systemic Disruption

Crop yields under simulated nuclear winter: a growth chamber experiment

Calculating equilibrium cereal prices during a multi-year productivity shock

Subscribe to the ALLFED newsletter